← 28 September 2026's Current Affairs · International Relations GS-2 Prelims ★★★★☆ Mains ★★★★★
UNGA's 81st session revives Security Council reform debate
ಸುದ್ದಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಏಕೆ?
G4 wants permanent UNSC seats — the two-thirds-plus-P5-ratification rule that keeps blocking them
The UNGA's 81st session saw renewed debate on UN Security Council reform between the G4 and the Uniting for Consensus bloc.
Why it matters: GS-2 core; factual, Prelims-type
What you need to know
2 ನಿಮಿಷ
The 81st session of the UN General Assembly took place amid renewed debate over reform of the UN Security Council, with the G4 group of India, Japan, Germany and Brazil continuing to press for permanent seats.
Opposing expansion of the permanent membership is the 'Uniting for Consensus' group, informally called the Coffee Club, which favours only expanding non-permanent seats.
Security Council reform remains stalled by the need for a two-thirds General Assembly majority and ratification by all five existing permanent members.
ಮೂಲಗಳು: Topper IAS editorial (PIB / The Hindu / Indian Express)
ಮುಖ್ಯ ಅಂಶಗಳು
Remember these
- The UNGA's 81st session saw renewed debate over UN Security Council reform.
- G4 = India, Japan, Germany and Brazil, pressing for permanent Security Council seats.
- 'Uniting for Consensus' (informally the Coffee Club) opposes permanent-seat expansion, favouring more non-permanent seats.
- UN Charter amendment needs a two-thirds UNGA majority plus ratification by all five existing permanent members.
ಪ್ರಿಲಿಮ್ಸ್ · ಮೇನ್ಸ್
How the exam will ask it
ಪ್ರಿಲಿಮ್ಸ್
- The G4 grouping comprises India, Japan, Germany and Brazil.
- 'Uniting for Consensus' is informally known as the Coffee Club.
- Security Council reform requires a two-thirds majority in the UN General Assembly.
- Any Charter amendment must also be ratified by all five permanent Security Council members.
ಮೇನ್ಸ್
GS Paper 2 - International Relations. The UN Security Council's composition still reflects the 1945 post-war order, and its reform mechanism - a two-thirds UNGA majority plus ratification by all five permanent members - lets the P5 effectively veto changes to their own privileged status. This structural deadlock, sharpened by the G4-versus-Uniting for Consensus divide, keeps stalling India's bid for a permanent seat despite its growing global standing; the way forward lies in sustained Intergovernmental Negotiations (IGN) and coalition-building that bridges both blocs.
Quick recall
Answer before you reveal
G4 ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರಗಳ ಶಾಶ್ವತ ವಿಶ್ವಸಂಸ್ಥೆ ಭದ್ರತಾ ಮಂಡಳಿ ಸ್ಥಾನದ ಬೇಡಿಕೆಯನ್ನು ವಿರೋಧಿಸಿ, ಕೇವಲ ಶಾಶ್ವತೇತರ ಸದಸ್ಯತ್ವ ವಿಸ್ತರಣೆ ಪರವಾಗಿರುವ ಗುಂಪನ್ನು ಔಪಚಾರಿಕವಾಗಿ ಏನೆಂದು ಕರೆಯಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ?
- ಅಲಿಪ್ತ ಚಳುವಳಿ
- ಗುಂಪು 77
- ಯುನೈಟಿಂಗ್ ಫಾರ್ ಕನ್ಸೆನ್ಸಸ್
- ಸಣ್ಣ ದ್ವೀಪ ಅಭಿವೃದ್ಧಿಶೀಲ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರಗಳು
ಉತ್ತರ ನೋಡಿ
ಉತ್ತರ: C — ಸರಿ: ಯುನೈಟಿಂಗ್ ಫಾರ್ ಕನ್ಸೆನ್ಸಸ್ - G4 ಶೈಲಿಯ ಶಾಶ್ವತ ಸ್ಥಾನ ವಿಸ್ತರಣೆಯ ವಿರೋಧಿ. • ಅಲಿಪ್ತ ಚಳುವಳಿ - ತಪ್ಪು. • ಗುಂಪು 77 - ತಪ್ಪು. • ಸಣ್ಣ ದ್ವೀಪ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರಗಳು - ತಪ್ಪು.
Convert this topic into marks
Today's 10-MCQ test · instant analysis · Powered by AdaptIQ