← 23 October 2026's Current Affairs · Polity GA Prelims ★★★☆☆ Mains ★★★☆☆
Supreme Court: Section 17A of the anti-corruption law does not shield public servants in bribe cases
খবরে কেন?
Prior approval before a bribery probe? Section 17A's 2018 clause and the on-the-spot arrest exception explained
The Supreme Court says the prior-approval clause in Section 17A of the PC Act cannot be used to shield bribe-takers.
Why it matters: general awareness
What you need to know
2 মিনিট
The Supreme Court has held that Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 does not protect public servants in bribery cases.
Section 17A, inserted by the 2018 amendment, requires prior approval before a police officer can start an inquiry into an offence linked to a recommendation or decision taken by a public servant in official functions.
The provision does not apply to cases of arrest on the spot for accepting or attempting to accept an undue advantage.
সূত্র: Topper IAS editorial (PIB / The Hindu / Indian Express)
মূল তথ্য
Remember these
- Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was inserted by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018.
- It requires prior approval before a police officer starts an inquiry or investigation into an offence linked to a recommendation or decision taken by a public servant in official functions.
- It does not apply to cases of arrest on the spot for accepting or attempting to accept an undue advantage.
- The Supreme Court held that the clause cannot be used to shield bribe-takers.
প্রিলিমস · মেইনস
How the exam will ask it
প্রিলিমস
- Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 was inserted by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018.
- Section 17A requires prior approval before a police officer inquires into an offence linked to a public servant's official recommendation or decision.
- The prior-approval requirement of Section 17A does not apply to arrest on the spot for accepting or attempting to accept an undue advantage.
মেইনস
GS-II (Judiciary; transparency and accountability): the issue is balancing protection of honest officials from vexatious probes against the need to prosecute corruption. Section 17A's prior-approval clause, inserted in 2018, is read down by the Supreme Court so it cannot shield bribe-takers caught red-handed. The implication is stronger accountability in trap cases; the way forward is clear, time-bound approval procedures that guard decision-making without delaying genuine investigations.
Quick recall
Answer before you reveal
With reference to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, consider the following statements:
- It was inserted into the Act by the 2018 amendment.
- It was inserted by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
- 1 only
- 2 only
- Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
উত্তর দেখুন
উত্তর: A — The correct answer is 1 only. Statement 1 is correct: Section 17A came through the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018, and statement 2 is wrong.
Convert this topic into marks
Today's 10-MCQ test · instant analysis · Powered by AdaptIQ